Writing.

Google-Agent ignores robots.txt, so the server log is the only place you'll see it. I pulled 14 days of logs from both my sites, found 30,000 AI crawler hits and zero Google-Agent, and changed five things anyway.

The Safe Drinking Water Act covers more than 90 contaminants — right up until the water crosses onto your building's property. After that, nobody's testing anything.

Most of the world worries about pathogens in water. We worry about parts per trillion. Both are real problems — but knowing which one you have changes what you should do about it.

The biggest fear-based talking point in my industry doesn't hold up — and the honest case for better office water is stronger without it.

Most office water setups were built for a headcount that stopped showing up years ago — and nobody went back and fixed the math.

Drinking water compliance is built on annual averages and 95th percentiles — which is good policy and still tells you almost nothing about what came out of the tap in your breakroom last Tuesday.

The water in your office cooler jug and the water in your building's pipes are regulated by two different federal agencies under two different rulebooks — a distinction that rarely comes up when the water order gets placed.

Contamination and dehydration get treated as separate issues. In practice, the first one shapes the second.

California wrote one of the first regulatory definitions of microplastics in drinking water. Everywhere else, the word doesn't legally mean anything yet — and that's the whole problem.

One of the largest PFAS datasets ever collected in the U.S. finished sampling. Most people responsible for a building still haven't looked up their own numbers.

The U.S. and the EU publish different hydration targets, and the gap between them is wider than most people would guess.

EPA is proposing to pull back standards for four PFAS chemicals while Europe's broader rules phase in — and your office breakroom sits on the wrong side of that split.